In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only completed if the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence along with the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were effectively mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to become appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents on the boy or Woman usually do not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they can do if they're able to cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who's a major, the pair is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by law.

Sign up for E-mail Notification of recent opinions The cases listed below have experienced opinions filed for them within the last fourteen times. The following information is available for Each individual case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, like signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.

13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed to your disposal of the instant petition about the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner as well as private check here respondents and will just take care of all of the facets of the case and make sure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

Only a few years ago, searching for case precedent was a tough and time consuming job, demanding people today to search through print copies of case regulation, or to purchase access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a host of case regulation search alternatives, and several sources offer free access to case law.

All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in help with the Supreme Court, making certain the enforcement of its judgments. As being the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been attained, the decision of your Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. Read more

In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there may perhaps exist conflicts between the assorted lessen appellate courts. Sometimes these differences will not be resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling about the same style of case.

Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives in the police is usually to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, ensure regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to the offender as well as Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.

Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government procedures for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. For that reason, this petition is admissible based on established court precedents, plus the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more

The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to some tradition that the reader should be capable of deduce the logic from the decision plus the statutes.[four]

In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.

Criminal cases Inside the common law tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to your case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. In contrast to most civil legislation systems, common law systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decrease courts should make decisions dependable with the previous decisions of higher courts.